Part I is here.

Part II is here.

Are there concerted efforts to control the world population?

Yes there are. The exact measures taken and what actions to be used is not entirely clear, but there are certainly official concerted efforts and plans to control the world population.

In 1974 the United States had a strategic plan drafted to deal with the future population problems the world would face. It is called National Security Study Memorandum 200. There is also a World Population Plan of Action adopted by the U.N. in Bucharest in August of 1974. As recently as 1994 a U.S. Presidential Decision Directive was issued in support of population control measures. Many of these measures are specific about providing for free abortions and education about STD’s and other reproductive topics but as has already been discussed in this series, vaccines causing sterility could well be a part of these efforts when the World Health Organization is in part responsible for some of the vaccination problems.

The hardest part is that we want to believe the best of people and not that there may be a group of individuals who are happy to cause the non-births of millions if not billions of people. Or that some people are perfectly happy to let millions or billions of people die from natural causes via poor health, lack of nutrition, and a lack of food. There is an organized movement afoot to cause and allow the massive depopulation of the earth. Which brings us to one of the most politicized diseases of the ages, AIDS.

AIDS has not been so much of a hot-button issue recently because the mass panic over it has blown over and the number of cases in the United States have decreased and now it is only really growing rapidly in places we don’t live or associate really like Africa and Asia. AIDS has mostly gone off the radar screen for many, many people.

Looking at scientific/emotional issues of the last 20 years or so there have been about three major ones. The Ozone layer (it turned out fine) AIDS (not so fine) and Global Warming (still out for decision). Of the three, AIDS should be the easiest one to have all the answers about. The Ozone layer is so big and massive and out there that it really is difficult to measure, quantify and predict how it works. Global Warming is affected by so many environmental factors that it too is the subject of some scientific debate and it is difficult to truly find a coherent smooth explanation for it. AIDS on the other hand is an infectious disease and there are so many experts on infectious diseases that you would think it would be easy to get some simple answers about the problem, right?

AIDS Overview

An investigative journalist, Celia Farber wrote about AIDS for seven years and ran into several difficulties in trying to simply gain logical information about HIV, AZT and AIDS. In her words “All I ever did was follow and report, with what some may consider excessive attention, the vital debate about whether HIV is the cause of AIDS And whether AZT is a viable therapy for those who are HIV antibody positive. And whether being HIV antibody positive is the same as ‘having’ HIV. And whether ‘having’ HIV necessarily means your immune system is decaying. Etc.” These are all reasonable questions when being HIV positive is supposed to be an automatic death sentence. Especially when a person can get the flu, a common cold, and any other number of viruses and get better and if you were to test their blood it would test positive for antibodies for all of those viruses. That’s actually how the body gets better.

Ms. Farber was not able to have her simple questions answered and there are several scientists that don’t believe the story of how HIV leads to AIDS and where HIV came from either. It is worth thinking about at least.

Just as a brief overview, AIDS means Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. It means your body can’t fight off illnesses like it used to be able to. It is a secondary immune deficiency much like problems people have from radiation treatments, chemotherapy, or even more serious and long lasting conditions such as leukemia and multiple myeloma. For a more thorough, official, and somewhat incomprehensible definition of AIDS, here is a link to the CDC page where the definition has not been updated since 1993.

When AIDS was first discovered, the primary treatment was use of the drug AZT. The first cases were found in the white male homosexual populations in New York City and San Francisco. The primary test for HIV infection was to check for HIV antibodies in a blood test. There was a rapid spike in the number of infected people in the United States and the actual number of people with AIDS as of the end of 2007 is reported to be 1.3 million with 21,000 deaths from HIV/AIDS in 2007, or 1.61% mortality rate of the infected people, or 0.007% of all Americans assuming a total population of 300Million. Worldwide it is reported that around 3Million people have HIV/AIDS with 22.5 Million of them living in Africa.

Africa is a medical cesspit. They have a massive lack of clean water, farm land, food, medicine, vitamins, and nutritious food to meet their needs. There are insufficient medical supplies and sterile needles to care for the people who become sick there. As a humanitarian gesture, vaccines were sent to Africa without sufficient sterile needles so that a specific disease may be prevented while potentially infecting the vaccinated patient with who-knows-what from another possibly ill person. Vaccinating a sick person is not good for that person because it can also further compromise their immune system. It is only natural the way things are that Africa would have the massive amount of HIV infected persons that are already there. The lack of sterile medical supplies and condoms makes a difference. It is sad really.

The Other Side of the AIDS Story

Celia Farber has found it very difficult to find the answers to whether HIV is really the cause of AIDS or not and was often rebuffed and unable to find clear answers to her questions.

Some people believe that HIV is actually a harmless infection that doesn’t cause AIDS. Because AIDS is related to immune system problems and that these problems can have multiple causes there is no reason to just take it for granted that HIV is the cause given the presence of anecdotal and other evidence. Some HIV positive people never got treated and turned out just fine. Other HIV positive people felt just fine and began a full AZT regimen and died in a few months. It should be a more serious debate.

Chemotherapy and radiation treatment for cancer also cause immune deficiency at least for a temporary time while the treatments are ongoing. Another cause of immune deficiency from attacking bone marrow is the drug AZT. AZT as was mentioned above was the first FDA approved drug for HIV and AIDS but it has such a high bone marrow toxicity that there is probably no way to really determine a chemically induced immune deficiency and AIDS. The worst part is that AZT was pushed on so many people who had HIV but not full-blown AIDS that the treatment may have actually been the cause of their death.

Part of the problem with HIV testing is false positives. If a population that is not likely to have HIV is all tested without regard to other indications of infection there will be a huge number of false positives. That is part of the problem with mass testing for illness when there are no specific indications of the illness being tested for. If a person has a false positive test and decides to be on the safe side and take AZT, it may in fact be the cause of their later contracting AIDS and dying.

With the homosexual populations in New York City and San Francisco, prior to the discovery of AIDS there was a great amount of soliciting the need for a Hepatitis B vaccine among the gay population. It is possible that the heightened awareness of STD’s among that population and the CDC putting pressure on the gay population to get tested led to many false positives which led to treatment which led to death.

Now the WHO has issued dosing guidelines for AZT in Africa that is at the toxic levels first prescribed in the U.S. in the 1980’s. It could amount to a chemically perpetrated murder of millions of Africans.

Another Reason for AIDS?

At least one person believes that AIDS does not spontaneously pop up but is cause by chemical means in already susceptible people either mentally or physically. I am not sure what to think of all of this. If you believe in the unmitigated evil of individuals hell bent on controlling the population of the world via abortion and vaccine induced infertility, AIDS is actually another tool for population control.

There are written reports from the United States and the UN advocating for population control. If abortion is one of the prime answers then outright murder is only a little farther along the path.

Here is an article about how things are coming together for population control. The point of AIDS is to divert money and resources away from the real basic needs people have such a clean water, peace, sterile medical supplies, sufficient food and vitamins. Instead, the WHO is vaccinating millions of Africans who already have suppressed immune systems therefore causing additional immune system difficulties. With the increase in HIV cases, AZT will be distributed among the people and really make them sick. With famine, war, stolen farmland, and a fake disease to distract us from the real problems there will potentially be millions of Africans dying for no good reason at all.  If you want to read about even more vaccine hijinks and mayhem and possibly causing death and cancer and dogs and cats sleeping together and mass hysteria, here is another good one to read.

I try not to glom on to any old conspiracy theory that pops up, but I thought this was one worth repeating given the current and past difficulties in medicine and vaccines. Like the doctor said in the interview with Matt Lauer, there is no conspiracy, the FDA, CDC, and your pediatricians all recommend these vaccines so that makes it all OK right? You can go back to sleep now.

Comments Welcome