The Cause of Liberty: “arise from the dust my sons, and be men” 2 Nephi 1:21

February 27, 2008

NASA and the Challenger

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 11:23 pm

Twenty-Two years ago, the Space Shuttle Challenger was destroyed during launch.  The date was January 28, 1986.  I was in Mr. Wilson’s Fifth Grade Class and while we were not watching the launch, a TV was brought in for us to watch the news coverage of the event.

Were I was really doesn’t matter, what does matter is that NASA got away with a cover up of what happened to the remains of the astronauts after the destruction and the decision making process that led to the launch under those circumstances in the first place.

It was a very cold day and ice had actually formed on some of the controls and parts of the shuttle, two pictures of the ice can be found here.   NASA claimed to have consulted with Morton Thiokol prior to going ahead with the launch, but NASA is the only business in town that sends people into space and if Morton Thiokol contradicted that statement it would probably put Thiokol out of business.  NASA also had many reasons to cover up their bad decision making.  If you think that they did not have bad decision making at NASA the later cover up about the Challenger should change your mind.

The basic sequence of events describing the destruction can be found here.   The launch began, the O-Rings did not seal properly and began to leak as well as vaporize from the intense heat, a little over a minute in the leak became more serious and fuel was leaking in an uncontrolled fashion causing a fire to expand, the liquid fuel tank to disintegrate and the remaining fuel to burn in a not quite explosive fashion.  The solid rocket motors ripped loose from the change in balance and the shuttle broke up in the process.

The first story from NASA is that all seven astronauts died very quickly in the original break up and would have only suffered a little.  The evidence uncovered over time shows otherwise.  A later NASA report indicates that the cause of death was not positively certain, the forces of breakup would not have been likely to cause serious injury and it was possible that the crew lost consciousness prior to the 207 mph impact with the water.  If the breakup did not cause serious injury and the people could lose consciousness because they were still alive, it is likely that the cause of death was the impact with the water.  The report is so non-committal and attempts to still color the events as innocuously as possible while avoiding the more likely difficult truth.  This page indicates that the likely cause of death was the impact with the water.  The uncomfortable question is whether the crew was awake and alert for the two and a half minute drop down to the water.

The Miami Herald daily newspaper also publishes Tropic, a weekly Sunday magazine with longer and more investigative articles.  Tropic carried an article about the cover up after the Challenger break up on November 13, 1988.  NASA prevented local medical examiners from having access to the remains of the crew.  The crew cabin showed no evidence of a rapid decompression of the type that would cause unconsciousness.  The remains of three of the crew members were driven in plastic garbage cans over several miles of highway in the back of a pick up truck to an air force base to keep them out of the jurisdiction of the medical examiner and to avoid any additional press notice.  There were many lies told and facts hidden and evidence destroyed.  Because NASA is the only space employer in town, people keep quiet to keep their jobs.  The whistle blower about the O-rings did the right thing but at the time of the printing of the article was finding it difficult to find work in the space industry.

The cover up did not work entirely, but that did not stop NASA from trying.

Comments Welcome

Conversation with my 2 year old.

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 5:02 pm

She was busy playing and “peetending”. I asked her if she was pretending and she said yes.

I explained that “pee-tending” is when parents are trying to potty train their child and remind them to go potty at regular intervals.

Later our two year old was telling me that her “peetending” was in the potty for some reason.

Kids are cute.

Sort of like this one. Don’t talk back to Darth Vader, ’cause he’ll get ya.

Comments Welcome

Obama’s Security at Risk?

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 3:48 pm

There are two stories out of Dallas, Texas about a campaign rally on Wednesday, February 20, 2008.  Barack Obama was scheduled to appear at Reunion Arena in front of approximately 17,000 people.

According to the Forth Worth Star Telegram, the screening of people attending the event was cut off about one hour prior to the event.  Local police, speaking on condition of anonymity expressed concern that so many people were admitted without even a cursory screening.  The Dallas Deputy Police Chief said that the order to not screen attendees was intended to speed up the seating process.  Source.

The next day, the Secret Service responded by denying that any order to suspend screening was issued adding that there was no need for magnetometers at the venue.  So in other words, we didn’t issue the order and even if we did there was no security risk because there was no need for metal detectors there anyway.  To finish off the statement, the Secret Service spokesman stated that they worked together with local law enforcement to “come up with a robust and comprehensive layered security plan that didn’t rely solely on any specific countermeasure to secure the area.”  Source.  

So, as the story unfolds, several local police officers noticed that security measures were relaxed approximately one  hour prior to an event where Barack Obama was to be speaking and the Deputy Police Chief went on record claiming that it was intended to seat people more quickly and while it might seem bad, the crowd seemed friendly.  Nice work there Chief.  The next day, the Secret Service denies that the order was given and the lack of screening of people was not an issue either.

In this case, I tend to believe the local Dallas Police as they may still be hurting from when another very popular person was killed in Dallas about 45 years ago.

Comments Welcome

Typing Speed?

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 2:00 pm

Only use this link in Firefox or another browser with superior ad blockers.  It more or less crashed Internet Explorer with spybot.

68 words

Speedtest

February 18, 2008

Sen. Chris Buttars and Racial Politics

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 8:38 am

“And they make a man an offender for a word. . .”2 Nephi 27:32; Isaiah 29:21

He has stepped on a land mine again. According to the Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune, and other news sources, Utah State Senator Chris Buttars said the following: “This baby is black, I’ll tell you. This is a dark, ugly thing[.]” Senator Howard Stephenson already called Senate Bill 48 “the ugly baby bill”. This bill was apparently designed to aid in the transition of the split of the Jordan School District in equalizing capital outlays for building new schools. The Utah Democratic Party is also supporting the bill in spite of Sen. Buttars comments. The news reporting about Sen. Buttars comment is drowning out the discussion about public funding for public school buildings.

The comment from Sen. Buttars shows a lack of appreciation of the current political environment, inartful wording, and racial insensitivity, not racism.  The bill was already called an “ugly baby”.  Sen. Buttars added on with words that are racially charged and have additional meanings that make sense in the context of the debate.  According to this dictionary, “black” can also mean deliberately harmful, inexcusable, without any moral quality or goodness.  “Dark” can mean evil, iniquitous, or wicked.  “Ugly” can mean disagreeable, unpleasant, and morally revolting.  Sen. Buttars certainly could have picked better words for disagreeing with the bill.

On the day of the comment made, it was brought to Sen. Buttars attention that he had breached the rules of decorum on the Senate floor. He immediately apologized for his comments and later left early for the day. Sen. Buttars also issued an apology to people who were offended by his remarks. Jeanetta Williams who currently heads the NAACP in Salt Lake City at first accepted the apology, then remembered prior comments by Sen. Buttars and decided to call for his resignation. Ms. Williams has been leading the NAACP of Salt Lake for approximately 16 years. As of two years ago, there has never been an independent audit of the funds of the organization and there have been other irregularities and complaints about Ms. Williams administration of the local organization.

Sen. Buttars also stated that he thought a certain school desegregation case was wrong too, tried to re-word his statement and ultimately to justify his beliefs based on the outcomes of the case without success. A better argument may have been that the national government should not be involved in local educational decisions and about the proper nature and role of the government but the point was never raised by Sen. Buttars.

Former Mayor Rocky Anderson once told James Evans, a black leader of the Salt Lake County Republican party that “to show slavish, blind obedience and deference to a dishonest, war-mongering, human-rights-violating president” is a bad thing.  “Slavish” can mean like a slave, or to blindly imitate something in a sycophantic way.  It is impossible to know for sure if Mr. Anderson meant to be intentionally offensive and hide behind the other meanings of the word slavish but that his words were pointedly addressed to a black individual is suspect.

However one may feel about these episodes, political discourse has degenerated to the point that the real issues are being shoved to the wayside while the public debates about whether or not someone should resign for having an opinion too far out of the mainstream.  There have been several controversies about the word “niggardly” which means stingy, miserly, or not generous.  The etymology of the word comes from the Norwegian word nigle and is similar to the word niggling that means trifling, small, or petty.  The other prohibited “N-word” comes from the Spanish, Portuguese, French, or Latin word negro, noir, or niger which all mean “black”.

Most of these complaints about racism have no substance to them.  Most politicians are actually victims of their enemies that make a big deal out of nothing.

Comments  Welcome

February 12, 2008

The USS Jimmy Carter, Undersea Cables, and the Internet

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 10:53 pm

It is not anything new that the government of the United States is monitoring the internet, email and other electronic communication in the United States.  Actually, it may be that Great Britain is spying on us and we are spying on them and sharing notes so as to avoid charges of domestic spying, but that is a discussion for another day.

There is a network of undersea cables connecting all of the major parts of the world.  Again, this is not new or surprising but there is some additional information that is interesting.  Here is a map of undersea cables with fiber optic capability.  There has long been a problem with the security of fiber optic land lines too.  Industrial espionage can be achieved by tapping into fiber optic lines.  The United States Military has developed technology that will enable the Navy to dive down to an underwater transoceanic line and insert a tap to intercept the information.  How exactly the information is retrieved or sent back in a timely manner is a technological issue that may have already been solved too.

The USS Jimmy Carter has been re-fitted to include a section 100 feet in length that will allow the vessel to perform additional functions of an unknown variety.   CNN reports that it will be used to intercept fiber optic line traffic.  The CNN report is over two years old.

Lucent Technologies has aided the NSA in creating technology that would enable tapping underwater lines as well.  Too bad the original inventors were not getting their due.

For the person who would like to read additional information about these long transoceanic cables, there is an additional article here.

Comments Welcome

February 10, 2008

This Blog Needs to Post more about LDS things.

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 10:09 am

According to Apostle, Seer, and Revelator M. Russel Ballard we need to use the new media including blogs “to contribute to a national conversation about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints”.  This injunction was given in a commencement speech at Brigham Young University – Hawaii in December of 2007.  Part of the concern is based on inaccurate stories and other information about The Church.  We also need to be cool about the conversation.  From the Church’s website reporting on the commencement speech:

Elder Ballard said there were too many conversations going on about the Church for Church representatives to respond to each individually, and that Church leaders “can’t answer every question, satisfy every inquiry and respond to every inaccuracy that exists.”

He said students should consider sharing their views on blogs, responding to online news reports and using the “new media” in other ways.

But he cautioned against arguing with others about their beliefs. “There is no need to become defensive or belligerent,” he said.

This is important for every Latter Day Saint to help along with the effort in giving proper and correct information about The Church.

Comments Welcome

February 4, 2008

The Hinckley Challenge

Filed under: Uncategorized — A Guy @ 10:39 pm

Some 17,000 people and more have accepted the Hinckley Challenge.  In honor of President Hinkley people are accepting the challenge to read the Book of Mormon in 97 days because President Hinckley was 97 years old when he died.

To sign up, go to http://www.hinckleychallenge.com.   I may just try to read it twice in that time.  Just because.

Comments Welcome

Blog at WordPress.com.